Threat research · Mobile
For mobile threat, device security & research comms leaders
Mobile threat stories that meet investigative standards
Mobile spyware and device-risk work sits at the intersection of security research, legal risk, and public narrative. Journalists, advocates, and regulators quote carefully—or not at all—when vendors overclaim. Cyberou helps research and comms leaders package investigations, co-bylines, and rapid response posts that preserve the technical spine your team stands behind while still giving marketing and PR something timely to ship.
- Long-form and briefing language aligned to how reporters actually quote technical claims
- Rapid response turns when news breaks, with sourcing discipline and legal checkpoints built in
- Co-authored formats that credit your researchers and protect sensitive methodology
- Executive and public summaries that do not dumb down victim impact or technical proof
Teams we work with
Case studies in this space
Challenge, approach, and outcomes—written for marketing and GTM leaders.
Examples of work (live links)
Selected pieces from our public catalogue. Open the full catalogue for filters.
-
Abusing Data in the Middle: Surveillance Risks in China's State-Owned Mobile Ecosystem
Cyberou wrote this threat research for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog, with Axios, Forbes, CyberScoop coverage.
-
Breaking Down ZeroDayRAT: New Spyware Targeting Android and iOS
Cyberou wrote this threat research for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog.
-
Cellik: A New Android RAT With Play Store Integration
Cyberou wrote this threat research for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog.
-
FlexiSPY: The Spyware Tool Crossing the Line Between Security and Crime
Cyberou wrote this threat research for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog.
-
HyperRat: A New Android RAT Sold on Cybercrime Networks
Cyberou wrote this threat research for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog.
-
Scattered Spider: The Group That Blends Digital Attacks With Real-World Violence
Cyberou wrote this threat research for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog.
-
Renting Android Malware Is Getting Easier and Cheaper
Cyberou wrote this research report for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog.
-
The History of Stalkerware
Cyberou wrote this report for iVerify, published on iVerify Blog.
What marketing leaders say
“Daniel is extremely knowledgeable about the cybersecurity and threat landscape. His research is thorough, and his writing is publishing-ready.”
“Daniel was an amazing resource for my marketing team! He is very knowledgeable about all things cybersecurity and super easy to work with.”
“Daniel's sponsored post delivered 238 new sign-ups at just $6.30 CPA, an outstanding result. We're excited to continue and build an even stronger long-term partnership.”
“We've collaborated with Daniel on multiple cybersecurity projects, and he consistently exceeds expectations with his exceptional ability to produce amazing posts.”
“Daniel has been a massive boon for my very small marketing team at an early-stage startup. He's able to distill complex technical concepts into engaging, accessible content.”
“Daniel creates compelling content with high-quality articles and engaging social media posts tailored to our target audience. Very professional and articulate.”
“Daniel was great to work with on our LinkedIn campaign for TryHackMe. He was very prompt, communication was easy throughout, and we'd absolutely love to collaborate with him again.”
FAQ
We cannot always publish full data sets or customer names. How do you keep stories specific?
We work from agreed public facts, anonymised patterns legal approves, and explicit uncertainty where inference ends. Readers still get mechanics and impact; you do not promise evidence you cannot show.
Comms wants speed; research wants accuracy. Who wins?
Accuracy. We build parallel tracks: a tight external line comms can use quickly, and a longer technical publish path that lands when your team is ready. The external line never runs ahead of what research will defend.
Do you support embargoes, NGO coordination, or multi-party releases?
Yes. We have supported timed releases, briefing packs, and companion posts so PR, web, and research publish together—especially when partners or advocates need aligned language.
What does Content Studio cover versus Threat Labs in a typical programme?
Content Studio is your ongoing editorial engine: web, SEO, launches, ABM assets, and campaign copy with technical review baked in. Threat Labs is monitoring-led packaging—briefings, narratives, and optional vertical exclusivity when you need findings competitors cannot paste into their blog the same week.
How do SME, legal, and comms review usually run?
We draft with sourcing notes, assumption callouts, and approved claim language. Your PMM or research team fact-checks once per piece where needed; legal and comms often batch-review weekly after the first sprint establishes tone and guardrails.
How fast can we realistically start?
Focused pilots often kick off within a couple of weeks once brief, stakeholders, and disclosure rules are clear. Larger launches, analyst moments, or exclusivity windows need more runway—we spell out dates and dependencies in the first reply.
Plan a programme for your category
Tell us your timeline, buyers, and what you need shipped—we’ll reply with how Content Studio or Threat Labs maps to it.