Threat research · 27 months
For email, messaging & anti-phishing marketing leaders
Marketing that holds up when your buyer lives in the inbox
BEC pivots, malicious OAuth flows, quishing, and AI-generated lures all meet your buyer in the same place your product promises to protect. The hard part is not volume—it is sounding like incident reporting and peer education while every competitor posts another generic “AI phishing” take. Cyberou helps you ship cited angles, Tier-1-ready drafts, and feed programmes that SOC managers and IT admins actually forward.
- Narrative around BEC, account takeover, and inbox abuse that your SEs can drop into live opportunities
- Threat research and long-form that reference how attacks really enter mail, SaaS threads, and help desks
- Sponsored and organic LinkedIn built for practitioners who scroll past vendor fluff
- One partner across editorial, Threat Labs packaging, and launch comms so IR and marketing do not drift apart
Teams we work with
Case studies in this space
Challenge, approach, and outcomes—written for marketing and GTM leaders.
Examples of work (live links)
Selected pieces from our public catalogue. Open the full catalogue for filters.
-
Abrax666: Investigating the New AI Chatbot
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
-
Astaroth 2FA Phishing Kit Targeting Gmail, Yahoo, O365
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
-
Blov HTML Crypter: Evading Detection Through Encryption
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
-
Decoding ClickFix: Lessons From the Latest Browser-Based Phish
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
-
Devil-Traff: A New Bulk SMS Platform Driving Phishing Campaigns
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
-
Exploring the Malicious Usage of QR Codes
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
-
Exploring the World of AI Jailbreaks
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
-
FishXProxy Phishing Kit Lowers Barriers for Cybercriminals
Cyberou wrote this threat research for SlashNext, published on SlashNext Blog.
What marketing leaders say
“Daniel is extremely knowledgeable about the cybersecurity and threat landscape. His research is thorough, and his writing is publishing-ready.”
“Daniel was an amazing resource for my marketing team! He is very knowledgeable about all things cybersecurity and super easy to work with.”
“Daniel's sponsored post delivered 238 new sign-ups at just $6.30 CPA, an outstanding result. We're excited to continue and build an even stronger long-term partnership.”
“We've collaborated with Daniel on multiple cybersecurity projects, and he consistently exceeds expectations with his exceptional ability to produce amazing posts.”
“Daniel has been a massive boon for my very small marketing team at an early-stage startup. He's able to distill complex technical concepts into engaging, accessible content.”
“Daniel creates compelling content with high-quality articles and engaging social media posts tailored to our target audience. Very professional and articulate.”
“Daniel was great to work with on our LinkedIn campaign for TryHackMe. He was very prompt, communication was easy throughout, and we'd absolutely love to collaborate with him again.”
FAQ
Everyone in our category claims ‘AI phishing.’ How do we stand out without hype?
We anchor on observable behaviours—TTP changes, abuse workflows, and concrete operator detail—then tie product only where the evidence supports it. That is what earns press quotes, practitioner saves, and sales follow-up, not another buzzword headline.
Can you support a rapid-response turn when a major campaign (QR phishing, MFA fatigue, etc.) trends?
Yes. We plan for news windows: tight brief, researcher or PMM checkpoint, and a publish path that respects your disclosure rules. Speed matters less than accuracy—we build the chain of custody into the draft so legal is not surprised.
Our PMM owns narrative but IR will not sign off on speculative language. How do you handle that?
We separate what is sourced from what is inferred, label limitations explicitly, and route claims through your approved matrix. The goal is copy your IR team can defend in Slack the same day it ships.
What does Content Studio cover versus Threat Labs in a typical programme?
Content Studio is your ongoing editorial engine: web, SEO, launches, ABM assets, and campaign copy with technical review baked in. Threat Labs is monitoring-led packaging—briefings, narratives, and optional vertical exclusivity when you need findings competitors cannot paste into their blog the same week.
How do SME, legal, and comms review usually run?
We draft with sourcing notes, assumption callouts, and approved claim language. Your PMM or research team fact-checks once per piece where needed; legal and comms often batch-review weekly after the first sprint establishes tone and guardrails.
How fast can we realistically start?
Focused pilots often kick off within a couple of weeks once brief, stakeholders, and disclosure rules are clear. Larger launches, analyst moments, or exclusivity windows need more runway—we spell out dates and dependencies in the first reply.
Plan a programme for your category
Tell us your timeline, buyers, and what you need shipped—we’ll reply with how Content Studio or Threat Labs maps to it.